Monday, 14 May 2012


William Wang           U of T Law School Adopts new grading system          May.11 2012

   Before an exam students are stressed over the exam and after the exams the stress turns to the letter grade that they will be getting. To prevent less stress to the students, throughout the last two years studies have been done to help reduce stress over letter grades. Many universities in the United States have adopted to the pass or fail concept instead of the using the letter grades to let students enjoy the course and not panic a about the grades.

    The University of Toronto has also adopted a new grading system, but instead of using the new pass or fail system they will now be using high Honours, Honours, Pass, Low Pass, and Fail to grade students. By doing this it defeats the purpose of removing stress from students but instead all it did was used a different wording for letter grades. Now instead of students worrying about getting a C- or a F they will stress about not getting Low pass, or fail. Like the author states in the article The University of Toronto should just change the grading system to different super heros since changing the system didn’t remove the main target or the students stress.

In my opinion I think that changing the letter grade to just the past or fail system was a really smart idea, because it helps prevents students from worrying and comparing about grades. I can also relate to the stress of having to meet a certain grade for example having a C+ and a B is a big difference even though it can just be separated by a percent. With The University of Toronto changing the system to high Honours, Honours, Pass, Low Pass, and Fail I thought that there was really no point because we are just using another word for the letter grades and does not prevent any stress.

Thursday, 10 May 2012





Mandatory Physical Exercise at BCIT






For years the British Columbia Institute of technology has had mandatory "gym" time for their students without objection. However, students across the campus of BCIT slowly revolt against this mandatory program that consists of "first-year computer students being required to be inside the campus gym by 8:30"  

One BCIT student states “I try not to get too riled up about it,” says Chris Holisky, “but it’s hard.” claiming that the gym time is virtually useless and is insulting that students will not be able to graduate without this requirement. As Chris Holisky slowly gathers momentum with a petition to abolish the gym program, I cannot help but feel that this mandatory program ultimately is beneficial to these students and not detrimental. 

BCIT students argue that because the British Columbia Institute of Technology is virtually the only poly-Technic university that has mandatory exercise, we should take out this program. They state;. "As the only group of students on campus forced to get physical, they say the prerequisite unfairly implies they are exercise-phobic geeks. This is simply not true. Mandatory exercise is found all across Canada and in many countries as well, such as China which will be later explained. In Canada, from elementary school to mid high school, students are required to take physical education. Therefore, BCIT students are not the only group of students that are required to exercise but rather are part of a majority of people required to exercise. Furthermore, the argument that this program will imply that first year BCIT students are "exercise-phobic geeks" is a false assumption. Does the general public or other students look at students from grade 3 to grade 11 as "exercise-phobic geeks"? The answer is no. The fact of the matter is, programs that instill mandatory excercise like the one found in BCIT and in secondary/primary schooling, does not degrade the image of these particular students. 

The main reason why many schools and countries have mandatory physical programs is to promote healthy living as well as lower obesity rates. One of the major modern issues of our century is the over-consumption of unhealthy foods and lack of exercise. The United States of America alone has an average obese percentage of 42 percent (relative to population) and Canada's 24 percent which continues to grow. Therefore, we need programs such as the one in BCIT to create a safety net for Canadians. To ensure that Canadians maintain a certain level of healthy exercise and to make sure that the issue of obesity is being addressed. Therefore, programs that instill physical exercise can only benefit Canadians. 

A similar system of mandatory "gym" is also found across the pacific ocean in China. Business sectors in China require Chinese employees as well as citizens to do at least 8 minutes of exercise every day. Mr. Sun, a 30 year old chinese market states: "I think this [resumption] is really necessary, because people's living habits are very bad now. They sit in the office the whole day," Although BCIT's excercise program is not exactly the same as the ones found in china, the principle still stands. Cultures around the world have turned people lazy, exercises have become an inconvenience while the consumption of fatty foods have become a lifestyle. The only way to shape our culture into a better one that promotes healthy life styles, is to instill these healthy lifestyles into students. 

All in all, the mandatory physical exercise program at the British Columbia Institute of Technology only benefits students as well as our culture. The only reason why momentum is building to abolish this program is because students that are enraptured in our culture have become lazy. Living a lifestyle of convenience does not equate to a better lifestyle. 



Sunday, 6 May 2012

See my comment on ...

Midnight Ramblings of Disgruntled students

Additionally - we need to start focusing on our comments more too.  However, without posts is  very difficult to comment isn't it?  Hence, the emphasis on the collaboration aspect of working together. 

We only have a few weeks to go - anticipate approximately 4-5 posts in total.

Thursday, 3 May 2012

Administrator....

Can you change the font/ background please? This is difficult to read.

Wednesday, 2 May 2012





As Canada slowly implements a new two-tier system into the Canadian economy, the amount of outcry against this action is quite surprising. By implementing a system where temporary workers get a pay deduction of 15 percent, Canadian industries, markets, and ultimately the economy will improve.  As Diane Finley the Human Resource Minister said, We are taking action to ensure that the temporary foreign worker program support our economic recovery and effectively responds to local labour market demands." Therefore, I am personally in full support of this conservative plan to improve the economy and at the same time astounded by the amount of negative pressure placed onto this model. 


The Canadian economy, is an economy that is based greatly on exporting certain raw materials such as lumber and oil to other nations. The forestry industry alone contributes to almost 4 million jobs in Canada, and as a result, is one of canada's power industries vis-a-vis the economy. However, the major issue that is preventing this industry from prospering even further is the amount of costs businesses in this sector must pay for workers. As a result, Canadian businesses are discouraged from hiring more workers and ultimately can not keep up with consumer demand from countries such as china. By creating a system where Canadian businesses can afford to hire more workers to meet the demands of consumers, Canadian industries can ultimately prosper more and become more competitive on the international scale. 


Although, I understand the opposing arguments that this system might encourage employers to hire temporary workers and not Canadian citizens, I feel that the extent of this argument will not be so detrimental to the economy in the long term. Since the entry of Stephen Harper, immigration laws have been tightened greatly to accept skilled workers and immigrants over those without experience. We see doctors, engineers, and skilled contractors that are being accepted into Canada because of their qualifications. So what this means is, Canada is only accepting immigrants that will contribute to Canada accordingly to it's job demographics. Even now we see these policies work, skilled workers from across the globe are coming to Canada, in a sense, Canada is becoming a land of opportunity to many. Therefore, the problem is not attracting the best but rather providing an incentive to keep the best in Canada. What is happening is that the same workers that were accepted through immigrations, the doctors, the nurses etc,  are leaving Canada because there is no work given to them. This is occurring for two reasons, 1) the international recession, and more importantly 2) the competitive edge given to Canadian citizens over immigrants. Because employers must pay both Canadian citizens and immigrants the same amount, employers are hiring the Canadian citizens over temporary workers (patriotism). Well, why is this a bad thing? Well, when we have a system that does not give equal opportunities to skilled temporary workers that can contribute to Canada in ways Canadians cannot (cultural differences, different qualifications etc), that is when we say we are not looking to better Canada as a whole, moreover abiding by patriotic feelings. In addition, in many cases these temporary workers often become canadian citizens, bringing their own different skill sets and experiences to Canadian markets. Therefore, by providing an incentive (the two tiered system) to employers to hire temporary workers we are evening the playing field for the job market(employers will hire someone more if they do not need to pay as much) and more importantly providing jobs to workers to provide an incentive to keep the best in Canada. The greatest nations are nations that embody the best of all. 


Therefore, because of the fact that this two-tiered system will allow businesses to prosper to their max and provide incentives to skilled potential-canadian citizens, I feel that this plan is a brilliant idea proposed by the Canadian Government. 


Citations
http://www.jjica.com/lumber_demand.php
http://www.servicecanada.gc.ca/eng/qc/job_futures/statistics/8616.shtml
http://www.thestar.com/opinion/editorials/article/1168905--two-tiered-wage-system-announced-by-tories



Two-tiered wage system announced by Tories


Two-tiered wage system announced by Tories


On Wednesday April 25, 2012, Human Resources Minister Diane Finley quietly changed the rules of the prevailing wage, allowing foreign workers to be paid 15cents less than those who live in Canada. The reason why this happened was so it allowed us to help recover the economy and respond to local labour market demands said Diane. For the business leaders who wanted to recruit low cost workers, were thrilled about the change and immigration groups were heartsick at the exploitation of new comers who came to look for jobs.


 With this change of rule it can mean that Canadians will now have a harder time to compete for jobs since it would save companies more money hiring cheaper labour. This new rule being introduced will allow Canada to be heading towards the European route where foreign workers are paid less and treated differently, which can contradict with how everyone have the same basic rights and should be treated fairly in Canada. Furthermore more Canadians looking for jobs can be out of luck increasing the rate of poverty in Canada, after all shouldn't we help our own citizen before we allow foreigners to come into the country and work. 


  In my opinion I think that Canada should keep the old rules of everyone being paid the same and not discriminate against foreigners. I think everyone deserve to be treated the same and if owners are willing to hire people who are from another country they should pay them the same amount as a person who resides  in Canada. Another big problem is that if foreigners are getting paid less it would make it harder for the citizen of Canada to find jobs because companies would rather have lower paid workers for the same amount of work, this can eventually lead to many people heading into poverty. 

Tuesday, 3 April 2012

"Ontario’s highest court has legalized brothels in a sweeping decision that condemned current prostitution laws for adding to the hazards of a highly dangerous profession."


My personal opinion on this ruling by Ontario's court is one of compliance. Since the days of ancient Rome and quite possibly even before that time, forms of prostitution has always been present and always will be. Therefore, instead of trying to prevent an inevitable factor such as prostitution, we should learn to accept it's presence and control it. 


There are many problems associated with prostitution being unregulated and essentially illegal. "Pimps", individuals that control/abuse prostitutes, spread of STD's through prostitutes, and teen prostitution run rampant in Canada. In essence, because prostitution is illegal, regulations and guidelines around the selling of sex is non-existent (governments can not support an illegal act). We believe that if we make prostitution illegal that in itself will not exist, which has been proven wrong by the obvious presence of it in Canada. If prostitution was legalized, proper regulations and guidelines could be set by the government because the act itself is no longer illegal. 


If brothels were in place proper screening of disease could be administered to prostitutes wishing to "work" in the center. Which in turn will limit the spread of STD's passed from person to person. In addition, by creating a center for these individuals, the constant abuse from "pimps" can be eliminated and replaced with an environment that is overall safe for the individual. By eliminating the market for illegal prostitution( not in brothels), the amount of cases of teen prostitution will also follow. Clients, would much rather have a safe sexual experience than one prone to dangers such as disease. Thus, we can deduce that clients would go to brothels instead of street prostitution. And since teenagers in general are not allowed to be prostitutes by law (no teens in brothels), we can see that the amount of underage prostitution will fall because the market for illegal prostitution will diminish (due to clients going to brothels). Thus, teen prostitution will slowly diminish. 


One of the largest issues prostitution brings is the amount of profit that criminals obtain from it's acts. Prostitution if it remains illegal, essentially means that criminals alone control the sex industry. Organized crime and gangs takes advantage of prostitution being illegal and profits of its business. This money that is being made from criminals which will be spent on the criminals discretion (drugs, weapons, etc) is only empowering the crime world because the crime world alone controls this industry. However, with the implementation of brothels that provide a better safer service, this industry will no longer be owned by the crime world, but rather to the government. The money made from brothels will no longer perpetuate crimes but rather will stimulate the economy in a more stable manner. 

Ethics and morals can only go so far, until the practical factors ultimately outweigh the morale factors. The amount of detriments that prostitution carries can easily be fixed with the legalization of this act. 
"For want of a nail the shoe was lost.
For want of a shoe the horse was lost.For want of a horse the rider was lost.For want of a rider the message was lost.For want of a message the battle was lost.For want of a battle the kingdom was lost.And all for the want of a horseshoe nail"  -Marie robinette